counter on blogger

Pickle Me This

January 13, 2013

Is speculative fiction my "can't read"?

pig-talesIn June, I wrote this:

“Against Domesticated Fiction, or The Need for Re-Enchantment” was an essay by Patricia Robertson in Canadian Notes & Queries 84, in which Robertson decried contemporary writers in general for their failure to imagine the world beyond the individual, and the failure of contemporary writing to be anything but tedious. Hers was an inspiring argument, even stirring, and yet… I’m not yet tired of the kind of novel she’s maligning. Domesticated fiction remains what I most want to read, and I’m not nearly finished with it yet. And I don’t even have a good argument as to why this should be the case, except that I think that with the reader taking an imaginative leap, domesticated fiction can do as well as the fantastic, or any other kind of literature, to “incorporate some of the wildness, the strangeness, the mystery of the world around us.” To show that we are indeed “participants in a vast web of being.”**

Last week, Kyo Maclear published a fantastic essay at 49thShelf shelf about embracing “the bad read”, celebrating the kind of fiction that doesn’t go down easy. She wrote, “Yes, bring on the bad reads. Bring on those lousy good-for-nothing novels that embrace novelty, possibility, and surprise. Let’s hear it for god-awful fiction that believes anything can happen—that captures the weird, the awkward, the complicated, the downright bizarre…you know, the really real…in all its ghastly glory.”

Her argument was not dissimilar from Robertson’s, but Maclear came at it from a different point of view that made me less defensive. First, because she does that brilliant thing that critics never do wherein she celebrates one thing without necessarily denigrating another. And also because her point of view is similar to mine, as a reader and writer of “lyrical realism.” Her rallying call stirred my heart, and every part of my brain registered how completely right she was. How could I feel any other way, considering how often I am frustrated by readers’ refusal to be challenged by fiction? And yet, I could only be stirred so far. I don’t know who or what could ever compel me to pick up a porcine allegory, let alone an erotic one. (I’m still too afraid to read Tamara Faith Berger’s Maidenhead, for heaven’s sakes.) I want to be challenged, but I don’t want to be that challenged.

And isn’t that what we all find ourselves saying? When we throw up our arms and plead, “I’m 21 weeks pregnant with a small child and I only get the tiniest blocks of time to read in every day. Kindly leave me to read what I like. No sex pigs, please.” So yes, part of it is that I’m perpetually tired, as perpetually tired as every single human being on this planet is, but another part is that I cannot bring myself to be interested in a story unless human beings on this planet are what it’s addressing. Not just with books either–I can’t watch animated films unless its characters are people. I just don’t care. And I just don’t care about books depicting other worlds  either, or other versions of this one. I liked A Wrinkle In Time, but only when they were at home, for example. The only part I liked in The Princess Bride is when Fred Savage is reading with his grandfather.

So now I’m doing that thing, denigrating an entire genre, but I’m not actually. I’m just clarifying the enormous gulf that lies between me and the kind of “bad reads”, anything’s-possible book that Maclear recommends. Perhaps if I weren’t too tired, I might do well to pick up some books from Leah Bobet’s Speculative Fiction Titles for Literary Readers list. Maybe what I’m suffering is not so attitudinal as a lack of a bridge? Why am I so afraid to take a leap?

But it’s not fear altogether. I’m not scared of speculative fiction necessarily (though the sex pigs, yes, sound terrifying) but I just don’t quite see the need for it. I’m still not finished with this world yet, and I don’t know that fiction is either. And while it’s a stunning achievement to construct a new universe, I think that any fiction writer does that whenever she sits down to write. I think that realism is perfectly capable of “embrac[ing] novelty, possibility, and surprise”. That last year, books by Anakana Schofield did this, and Zadie Smith, and Lauren Groff (though yes, she’s a genre blurrer at heart), and Annette Lapointe did this. Even Carrie Snyder’s book And these are the books I will challenge myself to read, though they don’t go down as easy as, say, A Large Harmonium by Sue Sorensen (which is so so so wonderful. Have I told you that lately?). For me, these books aren’t necessarily “good-reads” and they have passages and sections I have to read over and over to understand and appreciate what’s going on. Maybe one woman’s good-read is another’s bad-read, and speculative fiction is my “can’t read”? And really, what is reading for? And for whose sake? Do we have to save the world with book we pick up? And why ever wouldn’t we want to? And who’d ever have the time?

As ever, I’ve got no answers, but I look forward to more circular arguments and frustrations in a forthcoming post on Olive Kitteridge, naturally.

**Interestingly, there are responses to Robertson’s piece in the latest issue of CNQ. I haven’t read them yet, but look forward to doing so.

4 Responses to “Is speculative fiction my "can't read"?”

  • Tudor says:

    I’ve been following your blog, lurking but never yet commenting, except I have to today. Because I think I completely agree with you that, bottom line, there are no “good” or “bad” reads or, for that matter, good or bad writes.

    The books I read to relax and unwind are very different from the books I read when studying English Literature or the books I read to my two sons or the books I read because they help me with my work.

    In all of the above categories there are some I love, some I hate, some that teach me things, some that stick with me long after I’ve put them down. There are even – and this is new since I’ve had children and my alloted reading time has shrunk – some I don’t finish. But that’s OK because the Book Bonanza at my children’s school benefits from receiving those.

    I think the same applies to writing. I don’t mind if somebody offers critique of my writing for its quality, but please, please don’t critique me for what I write in the first place. For me my subject matter is not a choice – it’s a drive – a story I have to tell.

    I think if I wrote something because I felt I “should” it would be terrible. When I write something because I must, I hope it will have enough truth in it to resonate with at least some readers.


  • Paul says:

    Hi Kerry,
    I’m wondering – do you find that it’s more difficult to get into a book when the place is made up or renamed, rather than a real place? Is Manawaka less interesting to you than County Mayo? Just curious.
    paul


  • Kerry says:

    Paul, Manawaka is made-up (well, kind of) but wholly formed from materials of this world. It’s not a fantasy place, and not just because it has a real-life precedent. It is one of those fictional places that helps me so the actual world more clearly. But I think that M. Laurence is an extraordinary writer, and lots of writers are much less successful at re-imagining actual places in their fiction. You have to be really good to make a Manawaka, or a Jubilee/Hanratty. In fact, I think that you have to be really good to render any real sense of place in fiction, even if the place you’re rendering is right outside your door. Anyway, yes, to me Manawaka is as interesting as County Mayo and perhaps even more-so because it’s a world I am more familiar with, and the pigs don’t talk. Also, as you can see, all my thoughts here are quite inchoate.


  • Rebecca says:

    Hi Kerry!

    I am also afraid of *Maidenhead*. I actually heard Berger read from it and thought the passage was pretty brilliant, but I also wanted to go home. Just not my kind of thing.

    I am pretty much a guilt-free reader–is that weird? Here’s how I think about it: there are SO MANY THINGS that I am poorer for not having read: Coriolanus, everything by Tolstoy except Anna Karenina, books that went out of print before I was born, anything with elves, the list goes on and on. And I’m never going to read it all–not while the human life-span stays what it is. So I figure, I can choose my poverty–since I’m never going to read every good (or “good”) book anyway, I might as well stick with the ones I think I might like. When I run out of those, I’ll consider Tolkien. Besides, those genres and subgenres I don’t care for have plenty of fans–I’m sure they don’t miss me.


  • Leave a Reply

    Current day month ye@r *

The M Word

The M Word Cover

Coming April 2014

The M Word Events
Waterloo: April 14 Indie Lit Night at Starlight Social Club, 8pm (w. Carrie Snyder)
Toronto: April 15 at Ben McNally Books, 6pm
Kingston: April 16 at Novel Idea, 7:30pm
Burlington: April 29 at Different Drummer's Book and Author Series, 9am
Calgary: May 4 at 3pm, Shelf Life, 3pm (w. Susan Olding, Fiona Lam & Myrl Coulter)
Winnipeg: May 6 at McNally Robinson, 7pm
Hamilton: May 7 at Bryan Prince Bookseller, 7pm
Toronto: May 15 at Another Story Book Shop, 7pm
Toronto: June 19 at Parent Books, 7pm
Everywhere Via Twitter Livechat: TBA


The Doors