February 27, 2023
On Conflict
Unless you’re someone who spends a lot of time on Twitter (and I’m sorry if this is indeed the case), Pamela Paul’s recent New York Times op-ed “In Defence of JK Rowling” might at first glance appear innocuous, even obvious. And because I’m now (blessedly) someone who doesn’t spend a lot of time on Twitter either, I don’t even find the op-ed remarkable. Nothing to see here, move along, which was what I was in the midst of doing when I listened to Amanda Ripley on the On Being podcast, which I found so deeply clarifying.
Now I’ve got to tell you that Pamela Paul has disappointed me. Former New York Times Book Review editor, and author of the bookish memoir My Life With Bob, which I loved and which actually changed my life, I’d sort of assumed that anybody so connected with books and reading would be far more interested and curious about the world in her columns than the Paul has proven herself to be, with hot takes such as, “Why Don’t Diversity Champions Champion Prime Minister Liz Truss’s Diverse Cabinet?”
Yawn.
(This may be the closest I’ve ever come to being one of those women who furiously post UNFOLLOWING when, say, for example, Reese Witherspoon posts a flattering profile of Michelle Obama.)
Paul’s schtick mainly seems to be appearing very reasonable while highlighting everything that’s silly/annoying/nonsensical/frustrating about identity politics, and while there’s a whole lot of material there to work with there, for sure, I’m bothered by the way that doing so plays right into the hands of right wing trolls, and is categorically programmed to generate outrage, to be click-bait. And I’m sure it’s not merely happenstance that the entire occasion for Paul’s JK Rowling piece is a podcast produced by the media company founded by one Bari Weiss, the OG schickster, who has made highlighting everything that’s silly/annoying/nonsensical/frustrating about identity politics into a lucrative career, playing the victim while railing against others who are supposedly doing the very same.
What I loved about Amanda Ripley’s conversation with Krista Tippett on On Being was how it helped me understand what exactly it is about the Weiss’s and Pauls of our mediasphere that bothers me so much, why I find their posture of reasonableness so disingenuous and counterproductive.
There is no growth, no movement, no curiosity, no desire for understanding. Instead the same old arguments, treads digging deeper, over and over, and over and over, and even worse—it’s monetized, and stoking people’s fears and contempt for their neighbours. I don’t care where you lie on the political spectrum, or how reasonable you purport to be—that’s dangerous, and I hate that, and it’s also just profoundly uninteresting.
