counter on blogger

Pickle Me This

December 11, 2014

If you need me… Marilynne Robinson Update 1

housekeepingIf you need me for the next couple of weeks, I’ll be reading nothing but Marilynne Robinson.

For no good reason, except that I want to, and I think it will be good for me, and I have a bit of space for a focussed reading project, which I’m so pleased about, because I feel as though my reading lately has been scattered and something of a mad scramble.

I first reading Housekeeping perhaps in 2006, and here’s my shameful confession: I didn’t like it. I had been expecting something light and straightforward from the novel, which was not at all what it delivered. I was also not as smart a reader then as I am now (and it is my hope hope that I can continue to say this about every decade that passes in my reading life.) When I read Home in 2008, I was much more appreciative, though I don’t remember anything of the book now. Plus, I missed Gilead in the middle. I wonder now though how Robinson’s work changed between her first and third novel—is there a reason beyond my improved sensibility that had me like the latter book? And now the world has been imploring me to read her latest book, Lila, which reviews have noted as having thematic connections to Housekeeping, a cyclical structure to all four novels. So this is why I’ve decided to go back to the beginning.

I’m about halfway through Housekeeping now, and so pleased with what I’ve embarked upon. The book is unbelievably strange and really quite difficult—sentences that require much concentration to make sense of (though following their twists is such a pleasure). Part of the problem is the complex sentences used to described really odd images—that strange house with its sloped floors. I can’t visualize the trapdoor at the top of the stairs no matter how hard I try. Perhaps another trick of the book is that its difficulties are subtle, just under the surface. They’re a little bit like traps. It’s so Biblical too, but in a contemporary setting, without male characters—we’re not accustomed to this.

But what pleasures we reap from careful reading. Really beautiful, inside-out sentences that reframe the familiar in surprising ways. I loved, “And then the library was flooded to a depth of three shelves, creating vast gaps in the Dewey decimal system.” And that image of the sodden curtains’ weight bending the curtain rod. There is something slightly Shirley Jackson-ish about this household, which reminded me of We Have Always Lived in the Castle. No one there is quite right, but the terms of the characters’ difference is never quite clear. An anxiety underlying everything that is never really explained—the reader intuits. And I am impressed by the fleeting descriptions of motherhood: “She had always known a thousand ways to circle them all around with what must have seemed like grace.”

And oh, sentences like, “There would a general reclaiming of fallen buttons and misplace spectacles, of neighbours and kin, till time and error and accident were undone, and the world became comprehensible and whole.” You could think on that one over and over again.”

I came across a passage when I was reading last night:

Every spirit passing through the world fingers the tangible and mars the mutable, and finally has come to look and not to buy. So shoes are worn and hassocks are sat upon and finally everything is left where it was and the spirit passes on just as the wind in the orchard picks up the leaves from the ground as if there were no other pleasure in the world but brown leaves, as if it would deck, clothe, flesh itself in flourishes of dusty brown apple leaves, and then drops them all in a heap at the side of the house and goes on.

And it seemed so familiar; I was sure I’d read its echo recently. And finally I realized where it was from:

The dead live on in the homeliest of ways. They’re listed in the phone book, They get mail. Their wigs rest of styrofoam heads at the back of closets. Their beds are made. Their shoes are everywhere.

Which is altogether different, but not altogether altogether—I mean, those shoes? It’s from Elizabeth McCracken’s Thunderstruck and Other Stories, which Housekeeping recalls to me in more than a few places.

Anyway, I’m looking forward to Chapter Six.

5 thoughts on “If you need me… Marilynne Robinson Update 1”

  1. m says:

    I had been wary to read Housekeeping for years. Partly it was the title and partly it was because those who talked about it made it seem like it would be a difficult and “good for you” book (one that one should read but not really enjoy).

    But then, overdue with H, I bought all three of her books and read them one after each other in the first week of my Harriet’s life, before she even had a name. I haven’t bought Lila yet, but once I do, I think I’ll do what your doing and read them all back to back again.

    Housekeeping is unlike anything else I’ve read and I understand why some consider it a masterpiece. It’s incredible.

    1. Kerry says:

      It really really is a masterpiece. So glad to have another chance to finally appreciate it properly.

  2. Dora Dueck says:

    “Housekeeping” was the first of Robinson’s books that I read, and I was absolutely stunned by it. It rather spoiled me for her later books, actually; I found “Gilead” too precious somehow. Still haven’t read “Lila” but I do want to. My friend Paul Doerksen at Canadian Mennonite University has been doing a course in just Robinson this past semester; I should have taken it, I think. 🙂 Anyways, babbling on to say thanks for the post, and the inspiration to begin from the beginning as well, to return to “Housekeeping” and work my way through to “Lila”. — BTW, have you seen the NYT post from Tim Parks encouraging us to read with pen in hand and mark up our books? I’m afraid I’m rather old-school and can hardly bear the thought, but it sounds like “Housekeeping” would be a perfect candidate for exclamations and push-back.

    1. Kerry says:

      It really is the perfect book to read pen in hand. I thought of this last night as I was lying down reading it and wanting to write in all the margins, but not wanting enough (apparently) to actually get up and fetch a pen….

  3. Sarah says:

    All so interesting. I’m rereading it too, and loving it all over again, but surprised once again by how slowly you have to go to take everything in. The opening chapter is so dense with event and imagery and characters caught with just a couple of perfect sentences. Dora, I love what you say about marking it up — I really, really want to, but I just can’t bring myself to (maybe reading Tim Parks will persuade me). I even considered (briefly) buying a second copy to write in, but then decided it would be madness(imagine my house with all the books in duplicate!). So I’m also slowed by my need to sit & copy out some of these winding and beautiful sentences. And Kerry, one of the ones I loved is the one you quote about motherhood: “She had always known a thousand ways to circle them all around with what must have seemed like grace.” — That word ‘grace’ with all its theological connotations leads straight through to Gilead & Home. It’s fascinating seeing the connections that I didn’t make when I came to read her later books. Can’t wait for more from your Marilynne Robinson feast!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Pre-Order my New Novel: Out October 27


Sign up for Pickle Me This: The Digest

Best of the blog delivered to your inbox each month! The Digest also includes news and updates about my creative projects and opportunities for you to work with me.

Stop Wondering about Blogging, and Build a Blog That’s Wonder-Full:

Get My New Free Download: 5 MORE Prompts to Bring Back Your Blogging Spark!

Photo Kerry Clare with her Laptop

My Books

The Doors
Twitter Pinterest Pinterest Good Reads RSS Post